Further break down of proposal for presentation .

Sunday, December 2, 2007
Further break down of proposal for presentation.

Proposal as to how we could present the presentation:

Critically http://www.blogger.com/img/gl.bold.gif evaluate our curatorial approach,

Aims and objectives
Links to previous units - spanning back to first year

• Why community? - Association to our background as being digital photographers (how it has changed/ perceptions of digital photography and how every one can be a photographer/ what new media technology has introduced and accessibility) and from there the idea that everyone can be a photographer.

(READING + REFERENCES + DIFFERENCE IN THEORIES

WHAT IS THE POSITION THE GROUP HAS TAKEN?


Venue - links back to the community - regeneration/ gentrification - it also acts as an archive

• Venue – reason we chose m-l for exhibition, (its centrality to the Hackney social landscape – its historical connection to Hackney)

(ICONIC-STATUS of the hackney empire- bridging gap of the community by using common ground)

• Curatorial method of exhibition – drift – creation of web sites and flicker and blog. Presentation method- prints + projection.
What do readings say? Reference - what the group thoughts were on it - route took, why?
Did we use combination of theory/ideas?

Collaborative working methods and project management (See Trading Places in Shifting Practices,)
Ruth Claxton – artist led space.

Based around reading, critically review, reading and place groups stance within it
Why? How this influenced the collaboration?
THIS IS WHAT WE DID: LITERAL / ACTIONS TAKEN .

Action groups

• Budget
• Printing
• Designs
• Technical issues
• Web sites and blogs.
• Communication

Project management of the exhibition event,

• Putting up of work
• Gathering images in venue
• Invigilating
•

PATRICK